What if a major economy mandates minimum human-staffing quotas?
Mandated minimum-human-staffing ratios in retail/logistics cap automation and squeeze margins, but the macro read is mild stagflation-lite: fewer-worker pricing pressure lifts breakevens and nudges the Fed path. Rhymes with minimum-wage/scheduling-mandate cycles that raised services costs without recession. Trade: the inflation-expectations and real-yields legs are the signal; the crypto risk-on legs are noise on a labor-protection headline.
Every number ships with its receipt — the odds, the range, the precedents, and a public grade at Reality Check. The statistical machinery that produces it is proprietary.
The butterfly cascade
How this trigger trickles across markets, left → right — the root shock, its first‑order moves, then the ripple effects. Drag any node; tap a market for its real price history.
Resolution timeline — how this probability is moving
Our model's odds (electric blue) over time vs the market's (Polymarket, amber), from the past toward the 1–3 years horizon. Each dot is a real macro event that nudged the probability — green pushed it up, red pushed it down. Tap a dot for the source. Loading the probability audit trail…
What it would mean
If this plays out, it is a risk-on shock. A major economy legislates minimum-human-staffing ratios in retail and logistics, capping automation rollouts and squeezing margins. The trigger decomposes into signed root‑shocks — Job displacement ▼ · Labor shortage ▲ — which propagate through our causal graph to the markets below.