What if India diverts the Indus and chokes Pakistan's water?
A physical Chenab diversion is a slow-burn casus belli, not a same-day equity shock; the cleaner trade is long downside rupee/PKR and a regional risk premium, not selling Nvidia. Rhymes with the post-Pulwama/Balakot 2019 standoff, where the Nifty wobbled <2% and recovered within weeks while INR softened. Transmission runs Pakistan-side: an agrarian economy losing irrigation water faces a food-import and FX-reserve crunch, pressuring the IMF program — the equity-vol cascade here is overstated.
how we built this number — every step
The class rate is measured from our dated, sourced event library (decade-normalized Poisson — the full table is public at base_rates.json). The variant’s share within its class is the analyst’s editorial call, published so you can audit it. A wider range means thinner precedent. Full recipe: methodology · scored at Reality Check.
The butterfly cascade
How this trigger trickles across markets, left → right — the root shock, its first‑order moves, then the ripple effects. Drag any node; tap a market for its real price history.
Resolution timeline — how this probability is moving
Our model's odds (gold) over time vs the crowd's (Polymarket, blue), from the past toward the 1–3 years horizon. Each dot is a real macro event that nudged the probability — green pushed it up, red pushed it down. Tap a dot for the source. The gold path is an illustrative reconstruction anchored to today's estimate — real dated events, not a live re-estimate history.
What it would mean
If this plays out, it is a risk-off shock. With the treaty in abeyance, India breaks ground on Chenab canal diversion and storage, physically curtailing cross-border flows to Pakistan. The trigger decomposes into signed root‑shocks — Geopolitical risk ▲ · Climate/crop supply ▲ — which propagate through our causal graph to the markets below.
If it happens — the markets it would move
Biggest moves first. Projected moves are cascade-model priors; hist A–B% = what comparable past events actually did (measured abnormal returns), and model prior · unmeasured marks markets with no analogue backing yet. Tap any market for its price history.
| Market | Class | Projected move | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volatility (VIX) VIXon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Vol | ▲ +7.5% hist +0.66–+8.4% · other way -0.14% (n=11) |
| 2 | Nasdaq 100 NDXon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Index | ▼ -2.7% hist -1.73–-0.76% · other way -0.16% (n=11) |
| 3 | Tech sector XLK 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -1.9% hist -0.98–+0.1% · other way -0.02% (n=11) |
| 4 | Semiconductors SMHon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -1.4% hist -0.87–-0.48% · other way +3.27% (n=11) |
| 5 | S&P 500 SPXon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Index | ▼ -1.5% hist -1.09–-0.51% · other way -0.37% (n=12) |
| 6 | Gold XAUon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Commodity | ▲ +0.8% hist +0.01–+0.6% · other way -0.41% (n=11) |
| 7 | MicroStrategy MSTRon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -1.0% hist -1.36–+3.43% · other way +30.92% (n=11) |
| 8 | Nvidia NVDAon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -1.0% hist -0.63–-0.19% · other way +6.07% (n=11) |
| 9 | Solana SOLon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Crypto | ▼ -0.7% hist -3.24–+4.32% · other way -3.28% (n=10) |
| 10 | AMD AMDon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -0.9% hist -1.31–+0.03% · other way +0.39% (n=11) |
| 11 | Broadcom AVGOon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -0.9% hist -1.23–+1.39% · other way +2.35% (n=11) |
| 12 | Micron MUon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -0.9% hist -5.19–+1.57% · other way +0.15% (n=11) |
| 13 | TSMC TSMon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -0.9% hist -3.31–+0.69% · other way +2.87% (n=11) |
| 14 | Marvell MRVLon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -0.9% hist -1.67–+2.09% · other way +3.52% (n=11) |
Probable recommendation
Why we may diverge from history
Trust the cascade's LONG NOC: history's -4.3% leans on a 1991 Soviet-coup print and off-channel gold/tariff windows — thin, stale, and unrelated to a sustained South-Asia water-conflict bid for defense.
Historical precedent — what analogous events actually did
Across 40 analogous events (overlap‑weighted), as abnormal returns — market beta stripped, so it's the event's own effect, not the market backdrop. Shown at 20 days (persistent) and 5 days (immediate); ↺ fades = the two horizons disagree. Confidence = consistency × sample × significance.
| Asset | History says | Abnormal (20d · 5d) | Hit | n | Confidence | vs cascade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility VIX | LONG | +4.5% · 5d +4.0% | 67% | 29 | 0.30 | ✓ matches cascade |
| INTC INTC | SHORT | -3.0% · 5d -2.5% | 66% | 34 | 0.28 | ✓ matches cascade |
| XLF XLF | SHORT | -0.7% · 5d -0.0% | 66% | 27 | 0.25 | ✓ matches cascade |
| MSTR MSTR | LONG | +3.5% · 5d -2.2% ↺ fades | 66% | 27 | 0.22 | ⚠ differs |
| XLK XLK | LONG | +0.7% · 5d -0.5% ↺ fades | 64% | 27 | 0.21 | ⚠ differs |
| JPM JPM | SHORT | -1.5% · 5d -0.9% | 64% | 34 | 0.21 | ✓ matches cascade |
| RTX RTX | SHORT | -1.1% · 5d -1.4% | 60% | 40 | 0.19 | ⚠ differs |
| TRY TRY | SHORT | -0.4% · 5d +0.7% ↺ fades | 62% | 26 | 0.19 | ✓ matches cascade |
| TSM TSM | SHORT | -2.6% · 5d -2.8% | 62% | 28 | 0.18 | ✓ matches cascade |
| SOL SOL | LONG | +4.9% · 5d -8.2% ↺ fades | 63% | 13 | 0.17 | ⚠ differs |
| AMD AMD | SHORT | -0.8% · 5d -0.9% | 61% | 34 | 0.17 | ✓ matches cascade |
| 10y yield DGS10 | LONG | +10bp · 5d +5bp | 58% | 40 | 0.16 | · |
| GBPUSD GBPUSD | SHORT | -0.5% · 5d -0.2% | 59% | 26 | 0.14 | ✓ matches cascade |
| MU MU | SHORT | -4.4% · 5d -2.3% | 57% | 32 | 0.12 | ✓ matches cascade |
Why this probability
Treaty already in abeyance, but physical Chenab diversion is slow multi-year infra; partial groundbreaking plausible in 1-3y. A base‑rate‑anchored prior, continuously scored against what actually happens — not a forecast.