What if Iran's proxies break the truce and saturate Israel's defenses?
A multi-front Iranian-proxy saturation barrage overwhelming Israeli defenses is a wider regional shock — Brent leads WTI on Hormuz spillover fear, high-beta equity and tech sold hard. Direct analogue: October 2024's Iranian ballistic salvo, which spiked Brent then bled the premium as no barrels were lost. Transmission is the Strait of Hormuz to Asian importers; the forward angle is air-defense interceptor depletion — a credible saturation that exhausts Israeli/US magazines is the one path that keeps the oil premium sticky.
how we built this number — every step
The class rate is measured from our dated, sourced event library (decade-normalized Poisson — the full table is public at base_rates.json). The variant’s share within its class is the analyst’s editorial call, published so you can audit it. A wider range means thinner precedent. Full recipe: methodology · scored at Reality Check.
The butterfly cascade
How this trigger trickles across markets, left → right — the root shock, its first‑order moves, then the ripple effects. Drag any node; tap a market for its real price history.
Resolution timeline — how this probability is moving
Our model's odds (gold) over time vs the crowd's (Polymarket, blue), from the past toward the 0–6 months horizon. Each dot is a real macro event that nudged the probability — green pushed it up, red pushed it down. Tap a dot for the source. The gold path is an illustrative reconstruction anchored to today's estimate — real dated events, not a live re-estimate history.
What it would mean
If this plays out, it is a risk-off shock. The 60-day Iran truce collapses; Hezbollah, Houthis and Iraqi militias launch simultaneous saturation barrages exceeding 2026 levels, overwhelming Israeli air defenses nationwide. The trigger decomposes into signed root‑shocks — Geopolitical risk ▲ · Oil supply risk ▲ — which propagate through our causal graph to the markets below.
If it happens — the markets it would move
Biggest moves first. Projected moves are cascade-model priors; hist A–B% = what comparable past events actually did (measured abnormal returns), and model prior · unmeasured marks markets with no analogue backing yet. Tap any market for its price history.
| Market | Class | Projected move | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volatility (VIX) VIXon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Vol | ▲ +15.2% hist +2.89–+10.71% · other way -0.36% (n=12) |
| 2 | Nasdaq 100 NDXon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Index | ▼ -6.3% hist -3.05–-1.3% · other way -0.34% (n=12) |
| 3 | Brent crude BRENTon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Commodity | ▲ +4.2% hist -0.28–+2.63% · other way -3.03% (n=12) |
| 4 | Tech sector XLK 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -4.6% hist -2.67–-1.41% · other way -0.15% (n=12) |
| 5 | WTI crude CLon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Commodity | ▲ +3.4% hist -4.49–+1.87% · other way -2.56% (n=12) |
| 6 | S&P 500 SPXon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Index | ▼ -3.5% hist -2.31–-1.24% · other way +1.22% (n=12) |
| 7 | Semiconductors SMHon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -2.9% hist -1.92–-0.9% · other way +1.95% (n=12) |
| 8 | MicroStrategy MSTRon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -2.8% hist -3.42–+3.23% · other way +31.53% (n=12) |
| 9 | Energy sector XLEon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▲ +2.4% hist +0.01–+1.41% · other way -1.36% (n=12) |
| 10 | Solana SOLon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Crypto | ▼ -2.1% hist -2.46–+0.69% · other way -3.0% (n=12) |
| 11 | Bitcoin BTCon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Crypto | ▼ -1.6% hist -6.64–+1.46% · other way +7.71% (n=12) |
| 12 | United Airlines UAL 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -2.0% hist -2.45–+1.95% · other way +8.11% (n=12) |
| 13 | Hyperliquid (HYPE) HYPEon Hyperliquid | Crypto | ▼ -1.5% model prior · unmeasured |
| 14 | Nvidia NVDAon Hyperliquid 📈 chart | Equity | ▼ -2.1% hist -3.07–+0.05% · other way +3.19% (n=12) |
Probable recommendation
Why we may diverge from history
Trust the cascade LONG on CL/BRENT: a multi-front Iran-proxy saturation is a supply shock, yet history's -5-7% sample is OPEC-2014/Saudi-2020 demand gluts — contaminated, wrong-sign analogues.
Historical precedent — what analogous events actually did
Across 40 analogous events (overlap‑weighted), as abnormal returns — market beta stripped, so it's the event's own effect, not the market backdrop. Shown at 20 days (persistent) and 5 days (immediate); ↺ fades = the two horizons disagree. Confidence = consistency × sample × significance.
| Asset | History says | Abnormal (20d · 5d) | Hit | n | Confidence | vs cascade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COIN COIN | LONG | +12.0% · 5d +3.5% | 77% | 12 | 0.47 | ⚠ differs |
| HOOD HOOD | LONG | +8.2% · 5d +0.3% | 77% | 12 | 0.46 | ⚠ differs |
| CL CL | SHORT | -4.9% · 5d -2.6% | 70% | 25 | 0.36 | ⚠ differs |
| CNY CNY | SHORT | -0.6% · 5d -0.1% | 69% | 25 | 0.36 | ✓ matches cascade |
| NDX NDX | SHORT | -0.6% · 5d -0.9% | 72% | 32 | 0.34 | ✓ matches cascade |
| MU MU | SHORT | -4.2% · 5d -4.8% | 70% | 32 | 0.31 | ✓ matches cascade |
| MRVL MRVL | SHORT | -1.2% · 5d -3.4% | 70% | 25 | 0.30 | ✓ matches cascade |
| INTC INTC | SHORT | -3.6% · 5d -2.3% | 68% | 36 | 0.30 | ✓ matches cascade |
| Volatility VIX | LONG | +3.6% · 5d +4.5% | 66% | 29 | 0.29 | ✓ matches cascade |
| AMD AMD | SHORT | -1.3% · 5d -0.8% | 69% | 36 | 0.29 | ✓ matches cascade |
| NVDA NVDA | SHORT | -1.9% · 5d -4.8% | 62% | 26 | 0.21 | ✓ matches cascade |
| ETH ETH | SHORT | -4.6% · 5d -3.9% | 65% | 17 | 0.21 | ✓ matches cascade |
| SOL SOL | LONG | +1.8% · 5d -5.2% ↺ fades | 65% | 12 | 0.19 | ⚠ differs |
| High-yield credit HYG | SHORT | -0.6% · 5d -0.1% | 62% | 22 | 0.19 | ✓ matches cascade |
Why this probability
Coordinated multi-front saturation exceeding peak is demanding; proxies degraded post-2025; partial flare likelier. A base‑rate‑anchored prior, continuously scored against what actually happens — not a forecast.